What method provides a more accurate account of food workers' actions?

Direct monitoring offers a more accurate account of food workers' actions because it involves observation of the workers as they perform their tasks in real time. This method allows management to see firsthand whether safety protocols and procedures are being followed correctly. By directly observing the behavior and practices of employees, supervisors can assess compliance with food safety standards and immediately address any issues or non-conformities that may arise.

In contrast, self-reporting relies on workers to communicate their own compliance and behaviors, which can often be subjective and not entirely reliable. Workers might not always accurately represent their adherence to safety practices. Indirect monitoring might include reviewing records or reports rather than observing practices firsthand, which can miss real-time issues affecting food safety. Follow-up observations occur after initial assessments and may not capture ongoing behaviors or improvements adequately. Thus, while all methods have their value, direct monitoring stands out as the most effective in providing an accurate and immediate evaluation of food workers' actions.